The question of recumbent bikes vs upright bikes is one that’s likely on the mind of anyone who is thinking of taking up indoor cycling for exercise; after all, the COVID-19 pandemic has pushed lots of us to work out at home. If you have spent any time researching this topic, you’ll have found it to be an often confusing field full of different types of stationary bikes, many of which promise to do different things.
Two of the main types of exercise bikes you will find are recumbent and upright. To help you work out the differences between recumbent vs upright bikes, we’ve broken down exactly what each one is, how they operate, buy online cialis professional mastercard pharmacy which muscles they work, and who each bike would suit best. This will then aid you in helping to narrow down which type of bike is best for your own living situation, fitness level, and workout needs.
Recumbent bikes vs stationary bikes: what are they?
There are a number of different shapes and sizes of exercise bikes available for indoor workouts, but it’s crucial to get down to the differences in recumbent bikes vs stationary bikes. A stationary bike is one that you sit on and pedal like a regular bike, but the important difference, of course, is that it does not move forwards – there’s no crashing into walls here.
A stationary upright bike is designed to mimic a regular bike in terms of riding position, and so the crank is positioned vertically below the seat. They work by using one of two types of resistance – magnetic or a belt – to slow the flywheel (which can either be at the front or back), which you power via the pedals. Belts are more basic, and often found in bikes used in spin classes. Magnetic resistance bikes require a mains power connection, and when you dial up the resistance via the electric panel on the handlebars, the amount of electricity passing through the magnet builds, increasing the resistance applied to the flywheel thereby making it harder to pedal, meaning you have to increase your effort and burn more calories.